There are a number of important developments in the escalating U.S.-China trade war which warrant attention, specifically China 301 tariff actions taken—or to be taken—by the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”).  These events have consequences for U.S. companies and consumers, and merit attention for key dates and setting of priorities.  The USTR has organized its China Section 301 site into four separate trade actions, with separate lists for each action:  the $34 Billion Tariff Action (List 1); the $16 Billion Tariff Action (List 2); the $200 Billion Tariff Action (List 3); and the $300 Billion Tariff Action (List 4).  Information on each of these Tariff Actions can be accessed HERE.

Priority One for companies with imported Chinese products on Lists 1- 3 is to submit comments on the USTR’s proposed tariff increase from an additional 25 percent to 30 percent by September 20, 2019.  Assuming that the Administration goes forward with the increase, October 1, 2019 is the anticipated date of implementation.

Priority Two for companies with imported Chinese products on List 3 is to submit product exclusion requests by the September 30, 2019 deadline.  Those List 3 requests granted by the Administration will apply retroactively to September 24, 2018, and will extend for one year after the publication of the exclusion determination in the Federal Register.  (The opportunity to request product exclusions for Lists 1 and 2 has closed.)

Priority Three for companies with imported products on List 4  is to determine whether their products appear on List 4A or List 4B.  If on List 4A, then an additional tariff of 15 percent recently commenced on September 1, 2019, rather than the 10 percent originally announced.  If on List 4B, an additional 15 percent tariff (rather than 10 percent) will not commence until December 15, 2019.  This bifurcated approach arose from the Administration’s desire not to hurt retailers during their busy holiday season when consumers contemplate purchases of such items as toys, laptops, smart phones, and certain items of footwear and clothing.

The International Trade team at FisherBroyles has extensive experience in representing and advising clients on tariff matters, and we are currently helping clients address issues arising from the Section 301 investigation.  We can assist your company by reviewing your line,  in an effort to help mitigate the impact of the Section 301 Tariffs.  We can  prepare comments as to why the tariffs should not be increased from 25 percent to 30 percent with respect to products appearing on Lists 1-3, file exclusion requests with respect to products that are on List 3 and eventually List 4 (once a process for exclusion has been established).  If you have any questions regarding the Section 301 tariffs or would like to  discuss possible strategies relating to them, please contact any of the following FisherBroyles partners.

Philip Gallas
Philip Gallas
philip.gallas@fisherbroyles.com
(816) 401-9622

Geoffrey Goodale
Geoffrey Goodale
geoffrey.goodale@fisherbroyles.com
(202) 261-6644

Michael Cone
Michael Cone
michael.cone@fisherbroyles.com
(212) 655-5471

Chris Pey
Chris Pey
chris.pey@fisherbroyles.com
(646) 233-2533

FisherBroyles, LLP – Cloud-based. Not Virtual™

Founded in 2002, FisherBroyles, LLP was the first in the US, and now the largest full-service, cloud-based law firm in the world. The Next Generation Law Firm has grown to approximately 225 attorneys in 21 offices nationwide. The FisherBroyles’ Law Firm 2.0® model leverages technology to offer a cost-effective solution without sacrificing Big Law quality by eliminating overhead that does not add value to clients. Visit our website at www.fisherbroyles.com to learn more about our firm’s unique approach and how we can meet your needs.

These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and under rules applicable to the professional conduct of attorneys in various jurisdictions may be considered advertising materials. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer you select are important decisions that should not be based on these materials alone.

© 2019 FisherBroyles, LLP